Ever since the charges of spreading “inexact, incomplete and contradictory”information have been levied, the scientific community has been eyeing this case closely. They’ve argued a conviction would set a dangerous precedent for scientists in the field–there’s not even a way to predict major quakes, they said, along with the scientists’ defense. In protest, a petition was signed by more than 5,000 scientists. They were concerned then–and likely are even more-so now–about a “chilling effect” that could be started by a conviction: If this is the end result of working in the field, then who is going to want to be there, much less share their results? There’s no word yet on if the defense will file an appeal. BBC
